![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||
|
What makes a good drum? Paul Marshall ©2005 This is pure opinion based on my own playing style and preferences. This guide is setting out how to identify professional quality instruments with the priorities being sound, function and aesthetics in that order. I am not looking for a traditional heavy skinned instrument but an articulate, responsive and warm sounding drum. There are really only three main things that are critical to make a good player's bodhrán, skin skin skin. The rest is secondary beyond the ability to support the stresses and provide tuning. The standard
Seamus's 'buttery sounding' lambeg skins are supremely articulate and full sounding with plenty of attack. They are player sensitive and react very well and with great clarity in all hand positions, particularly in the higher register of the instrument. In the review (upcoming) I give Seamus 9/10 for skins, 8 for construction and, 7 for aesthetics. The O'Kane is the standard professional & serious amateur instrument. Seamus is taking orders again - get them while they're hot, they're lovely. (little bit of Python there) The Skin
Suppleness balanced with attack are what I first look for in a drum skin. You can go very soft with part tanned heads which reduce stroke clarity but are more full sounding. Skins can be processed by makers to make them more flexible, Rob Forkner of Metloef has a very effective method for making skins super flexible .
Lambeg skins are superb because of the evenness of skin having been hand-scraped, there are other thin skins that will sound well but it's more of a lottery. Because of this thinnness, lambeg skins react well to bodhrán makers' processing and perfectly provide that thin, supple skin so much in demand.
A weighted skin (right) is also an option, again a Metloef feature. I like the sound of a weighted skin but have taken the weights off my drums for now as I'm struggling with placement so that it is not in the way when playing. Rob now covers them with a super thin layer of skin which will make a big difference.
The shell. Bottom line - a shell merely needs to be strong to support the stresses of tuning and playing, anything beyond that is a bonus. You don't need a crossbar. The shell needs to be thin enough to vibrate and help the drum speak, Seamus O'Kane & Metloef have good balanced strong shells.
There are other tuning systems of increasing complexity, Eckermann and Erle Bartlett use an internal system that pushes up a ring slotted inside the main shell. The bearing edge over which the skin passes is on this ring. This gives a smoother profile and makes the playable area of the drum bigger for the relative shell size. Essentially they all do the same thing in different ways. For my money the toolless system is an obvious requirement. Aesthetics Ok so if a drum sounds great, has a really responsive left hand action and is well built then, and only then, can I start getting fussy about how it looks. Seamus's matte black drums do let down the overall package however, the rest of it is superb, Metloef make beautifully finished drums as do Eckermann and Hedwitschak. Check the reviews for images and my individual opinions. If there is any kind of celtic / beer / book of kells / etc logo or other design on the skin apart from the maker's signature or stamp, it's not worth even considering but then I didn't need to tell you that :)
|
||||||||||
|
(c)2005-2007 |
||||||||||